Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

0977

reference
945-tree-1
name
0977
tree-preservation-order

undefined

945-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.026573 50.877077)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.026460 50.877065,-1.026465 50.877088,-1.026481 50.877108,-1.026505 50.877124,-1.026537 50.877134,-1.026572 50.877138,-1.026607 50.877135,-1.026639 50.877125,-1.026665 50.877109,-1.026681 50.877089,-1.026687 50.877067,-1.026682 50.877045,-1.026666 50.877025,-1.026642 50.877009,-1.026610 50.876998,-1.026575 50.876994,-1.026540 50.876998,-1.026508 50.877008,-1.026482 50.877023,-1.026466 50.877043,-1.026460 50.877065)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL